Arabic Phonological Interference: Contrastive Analysis of Arabic Phonemes Against Indonesian Phonemes in Non-Arabic Literature Department Students of Al-Azhar University

Authors

  • Ayu Sekarsari Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara
  • Annisa Eka Putri Aullia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara
  • Nailah Kaltsum Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rofiqo Hasanah Saragih Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rosita Dongoran Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

Interference, Consonants, Vowels, Articulation

Abstract

Phonological interference events may occur due to two-language contacts. An Arab and Indonesian interaction allows a language contact that can lead foreign language users to experience phonological and grammatical interferences. This study is focused on phonological interferences on non-Arabic students of the Al-Azhar University of Indonesia. The objective of this study is to provide information on phonemic interferences in novice Arabic learners. This study also gives merits to Arabic teachers in Indonesia to find appropriate learning methods and strategies. Descriptive method and contrastive method were employed in this study. Data collection was conducted using sound recordings on 12 students of 6 faculties by way of reading of Arabic phonemes. Based on the recordings, 14 consonant-tone interferences were found: /ġ/ realized as [g], /q/ realized as [k], /ś/ realized as [s], /ʕ/ realized as [?], /ŧ/ realized as [t], /z/ realized as [ṣ], /ṣ/ realized as [s], /x/ realized as [h] and [ħ]/ħ/ realized as [h], /đ/ realized as [d] and [ð], /ð/ realized as [z], /θ/ realized as [s], /ż/ realized as [z] and [ð], /h/ realized as [ħ]. Vowel interferences were found in 4 vowels: short /a/ vowel realized as [ɔ], long /a:/ vowel realized as [o], /i:/ realized as [i] and /u:/ realized as [u]. The most frequent deviations were found in consonant /ż/ realized as [z] and consonant /θ/ realized as [s] as much as 29.76%. The interference level of each respondent was influenced by two things: the duration of learning and the frequency of day-to-day language use.

References

Chaer. Abdul et. al.2010. Sosiolinguistik suatu Pengantar. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Crystal. David, A Dictionary of Linguistic and Phonetics, Blackwell Publishing, UK, 2008

Jendra I Wayan. 1991. Dasar – Dasar Sosiolinguistik. Denpasar: Ikayana

Letmiros. Tesis, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia, 1996. patent

Nur. Tajuddin, analisis kontrastif dalam studi bahasa arab. Journal of Arabic Studies 1 (2), p64-74,2016

Richards. Jack C, Scmidt. Richard, Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, Routledge, New York, 2010

Tobing, Roswita Lumban. Tesis, Program Pascasarjana, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2012,Patent

Weinreich. Uriel.1979. Language in Contacts: Finding and Problems.Mouton Publishe: Paris

Downloads

Published

2024-12-22

How to Cite

Ayu Sekarsari, Annisa Eka Putri Aullia, Nailah Kaltsum, Rofiqo Hasanah Saragih, & Rosita Dongoran. (2024). Arabic Phonological Interference: Contrastive Analysis of Arabic Phonemes Against Indonesian Phonemes in Non-Arabic Literature Department Students of Al-Azhar University. Aslama: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(4), 155–165. Retrieved from https://aslama.kjii.org/index.php/i/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Articles